Steve Jobs Lesson For Investors & Entreprenuers

If you have read my blog in the past – you know that I am a big Apple supporter.  I own many Apple products, own shares in the company and respect the way that the company is run.  I also realize that many people hate Apple for numerous reasons.  Whether you love ’em or hate ’em the following Steve Jobs speech, to his new VPs, provides a valuable lesson for everyone.  I find it especially applicable in my world of  investors and entrepreneurs.

Steve Jobs gives employees a little speech when they’re promoted to Vice President at Apple, according to Adam Lashinsky in a new article in Fortune that’s not online yet.  Lashinsky calls it the “Difference Between the Janitor and the Vice President.”

Jobs tells the VP that if the garbage in his office is not being emptied regularly for some reason, he would ask the janitor what the problem is. The janitor could reasonably respond by saying, “Well, the lock on the door was changed, and I couldn’t get a key.”

An irritation for Jobs, for an understandable excuse for why the janitor couldn’t do his job. As a janitor, he’s allowed to have excuses.  “When you’re the janitor, reasons matter,” Jobs tells newly minted VPs, according to Lashinsky.

“Somewhere between the janitor and the CEO, reasons stop mattering,” says Jobs, adding, that Rubicon is “crossed when you become a VP.”  In other words, you have no excuse for failure. You are now responsible for any mistakes that happen, and it doesn’t matter what you say.  (Business Insider)

I spend  a lot of time on Twitter more specifically StockTwits.  Jim Cramer, CNBC’s  Mad Money Host, is constantly being attacked on Twitter for calls that went awry.  Cramer has been a strong supporter of Silver.  The attacks hit a feverish pitch this week as Silver lost 25% – its worst week in 30 years.   The chatter prompted me to tweet the following:

As Steve Jobs says, “Somewhere between the janitor and the CEO reasons stop mattering.”  In my world, there is no one to blame.  If you are an investor and suffered a beat-down in Silver last week – look in the FREAKING mirror.  You are the only person responsible for your financial destiny.

 

Disclosure:  Currently holding a Long Term position in Silver Bullion – fortunately at much lower prices than current spot price.  No short term positions in bullion or Silver miners are currently held.

 

P.S.

I welcomed last week’s pull-back as an opportunity to acquire more ounces at lower prices.  Over the years, I have learned  that acquiring Long Term positions are best around Silver’s 200DMA.  We are not quite there yet.

Can Yahoo Regain Its Baller Status?

I started trading stocks in 1995.  My interest quickly gravitated towards internet related stocks.  Fortunately, there was an abundance of investment choices.  Netscape IPO’ed in 1995. Yahoo followed in 1996.  Many others would become tradeable over the next few years.  However, if I had started trading in 1990 or even 1994 my choices would have been very limited.  Sorta like it is today with Social Media Companies.  The more interesting pure plays like Facebook, Twitter and Zynga aren’t public yet.  So, unless you are an angel investor your only choices are derivative (related) plays.

I have recently become interested in an area at the intersection of mobile, social and cloud  –  real-time data processing in context. Imagine chatting with a friend on Twitter about buying an iPad.  Then while on your way to the Apple store, you receive an offer from Best Buy for free a $25 iTunes card if you buy an iPad from them.  Mining Twitter data and making recommendations in real-time is extremely complex.  A technology that enables such analysis is called Hadoop.   Pure play companies in this area are still private, thus attaining investment exposure requires a derivative play.

Last week the following headline hit my Twitter feed, “Yahoo Mulls Spinoff for Hadoop Software Unit.”  Unbeknownst to me, over the past six years Yahoo has helped developed Hadoop.  It uses the software to managed spam in Yahoo mail, determine which stories to place on its home page and pick relevant ads for viewers.  The Business Insider thinks that Yahoo could have a Billion Dollar business up its sleeve.  So, in spite of Yahoo’s anemic stock performance it was added to my watch list as a Hadoop derivative play.

On Monday, as it broke out  on news that hedge fund manager David Einhorn had established a new position – I pulled the trigger.

Josh Brown at The Reformed Broker says, “Finally, someone with the clout and capital comes along to help Yahoo common stock realize its full value. This company has some of the most prized assets on the Internet worldwide, all it needs is a little help making that fact pay off for long-suffering shareholders.” (WSJ Blogs)

Eric Jackson does an excellent sum of the parts analysis of Yahoo (Why I Love Yahoo).  He believes that Yahoo is worth over $30/share.   Interestingly, when most talk about Yahoo’s unlocked value it’s in reference to their 40% stake in Chinese internet company Alibaba Group.  It is time to start tacking on a few additional bucks per share for their Billion Dollar Hadoop business also.

Once upon a time Yahoo had “game.” It was a “baller.” Can it regain its glory? I don’t know, but I’m giving  it a shot.

——

The 8 Ballers of Mobile is portfolio leveraging the current trends in Mobile, Social and the Cloud.  The portfolio holds a maximum of eight stocks.  Under performers are constantly sold – this pruning serves as a risk reduction strategy.  Stocks are not equally weighted.

Year to date performance:  8 Ballers of Mobile 24.1% vs. S&P 500 8.2%

Disclosure: Currently long: ARM Holdings, NXP Semiconductor, Aruba Networks, TIBCO, Open Table, Sina Corporation, Apple, Yahoo. Positions may be sold at any time.

Transactions in 2011 include:

Buys: NXPI 2/1, ARMH 2/23, SINA 2/23, ARUN 2/23, TIBCO 4/15, YHOO 5/2

Sells: FFIV 2/23, RVBD 4/1, QCOM 4/13

Ad-Think: My Beef with Google

Give me a little time to set this up, but I think that it will be worth the read.

I have been using Twitter since 2009.  After my first 5 or 6 tweets to Shaq went unanswered, I began chatting with people like Chris Selland. As they say, Facebook is for people that you went to High School with, while Twitter is for people you wish that you went to High School with.  I have found that to be very true.  Chris is a very sharp guy who I have had many great discussions on the future of mobile computing.  I am admittedly an Apple guy while he is more in the Android camp.  So you can imagine that many of our discussions have ended with “we will have to agree to disagree.”

Yesterday, Chris tweeted a link to a Business Week article, “This Bubble is Different.”  That led to this interchange:

I didn’t really follow his point, but it was a long a article that I quickly read.  So, I kind of moved on.

Later that night, I read a Forbes article “Will the Real iPad Competitor Please Stand Up.” The gist of the article was Apple’s iPad  is eating everyones lunch and the only alternative is to compete on price. The author says competitors should be “Pricing them lower, much lower, than they are now.”

First of all, there are real cost to tablets.  Apple strategically, priced the iPad at $499 based on volume pricing agreements with suppliers, production yield improvements learned from iPhone manufacturing and many other variables.   Motorola didn’t price their tablet at $599 out of arrogance or greed – it simply didn’t have the relationships or learning to get to $499.  If they had priced it at $499 – they would have been losing money on every unit.  Based on an article today, Motorola is teetering on the edge as it is (Fortune).  That article led to this exchange:

Then Chris linked to a blog that he had written titled “A Computer in Every Pocket.”  It started

Had an exchange with Michael Dawson earlier today regarding the pessimistic Business Week ‘tech bubble’ post.  Leave it to a magazine to not see the big picture and describe only the downside of the huge disruptions taking place around us, while completely missing the opportunities.

Whoa, I think that I better go back and re-read that article. What had I said that I agreed with?

Just a little more background, for context:  Before I began trading full-time, I spent over 10 years working for a software company called Synopsys.  The company sold very complex design automation software to the high tech industry.  Customers included everyone from Intel and IBM to small start-ups that you have never heard of.  From day one, I learned that our software was sold based on value.  Intel used our software to produce products that would generate hundreds of millions of dollars to the company.  We were very unapologetic for asking for top dollar in return.

Herein lies my beef with Google.  Google is supposedly a tech company.  However, nearly all of its revenue comes from advertising.  This model worked well with desktop search, but has not extending to its other products.  How can I say that? Google does not have one business unit outside of search that generates 10% of its income.  This is a very unhealthy position for a business to be in.  As competitors attack its core search business, the company’s sustainability is at risk without other ways to offset those losses.

Google’s former CEO, Eric Schmidt, once rhetorically said “If we have a billion people using Android, you think we can’t make money from that?” All it would take, he said, is $10 per user per year.  First of all, where did the $10 number come from. Is that value based pricing or out of the blue?  Google has no history with value based pricing.  At Synopsys, value based pricing was ingrained in our DNA.

Most discussions on Apple and Google are centered around the open/closed debate.  I could care less about that.  I would be far less critical of Google if it charged a license fee for Android.  IMO, there are too many points between Google’s software development and its compensation.  It is dependent on its licensees developing the phone, the carriers marketing and selling the phones and finally an end user clicking on an add.  In the meantime it has real R&D and support costs.

Obviously if ads are bringing in the money, it drives behavior in these companies.  The Business Week article refers to the Wants as mathematicians poking around data hunting for trends to put the right ad in front of the right persons.  It kind of implies that they could be using their talents for a greater good.

The Business Week article was very critical of the “ad-think” mentality in Silicon Valley.  It expressed a concern over the legacy the ad-centric companies like Google and Facebook would leave.  It pointed out that in the 80’s Microsoft, Compaq and Intel left PC into the homes and business of millions.  In the 90s, the dot.com left behind an internet infrastructure to benefit businesses and consumers. The author was concerned that social networking boom may “leave us empty-handed.”  I thought that was a perfectly valid question and not nearly as negative as Chris.

I am not sure how the computer in every pocket entered the discussion, but I am all for that also.

Disclosure:  Long Apple.

The Evernet – The Next Bubble

Sooner or later we will collectively agree on a name for the next era in computing; post-PC, Social Local Mobile (SoLoMo) and mobile computing are names used quite often.  A few days ago I was introduced to a new term – Evernet.  According to whatis.com:

The term Evernet has been used to describe the convergence of wireless, broadband, and Internet telephony technologies that will result in the ability to be continuously connected to the Web anywhere using virtually any information device. Considered the next generation of Internet access, the Evernet assumes the emergence of an amount of bandwidth that would enable millions of homes to access the Web through inexpensive cable modem, DSL, or wireless connections.

I love the definition, but I am hoping for a catchier name. An investor, Stewart Alsop, was recently on Bloomberg West talking about a bubble in the Evernet.  This was the first time I’ve heard of the term and here is a guy already talking about a bubble in it.  Since most talking heads completely missed the internet and real estate bubbles, they are determined not to miss the next one.  To play it safe – now everything going up is a bubble.  I imagine the talking heads sleep better taking comfort in knowing that we were warned.

I normally tune out people whenever they utter the B word.  However, Alsop was saying something different.  He was saying that there is a new bubble on the horizon and we are years away before it pops.  Now I was all ears.

His thesis is that the next big thing is a ubiquitous broadband network that’s always present whether you are on a cell phone, in your office or at home.  Its key attributes will be its ubiquity and speed.  More access.  Faster access.  Where do I sign up?

This slide helps us think about this in investable themes.

The most recent addition into my 8 Ballers of Mobile portfolio, TIBCO , fits perfectly into Alsop’s theme.  TIBCO’s software enables companies to process their “Big Data” in context.

Where I slightly differ with Alsop is that he includes Social media in the internet (pre-Evernet) era.   Social Media is one of the forces driving the desire for an ubiquitous fast connection.  In my opinion, the next era will not only be about the plumbing (Evernet); but the applications like Social Media as well.

——-

The 8 Ballers of Mobile is portfolio leveraging the current trends in Mobile, Social and the Cloud.  The portfolio will not contain more than eight stocks.  Under performers are constantly sold.  This pruning strategy combined with the use of the 200DMA as a catastrophic stop – serves as the primary risk management methods.  Stocks are not equally weighted.

Year to date performance:  8 Ballers of Mobile 24.7% vs. S&P 500 8.3%

Disclosure: Currently long: ARM Holdings, NXP Semiconductor, Aruba Networks, TIBCO, Open Table, Sina Corporation, Apple. Positions may be sold at any time.

Transactions in 2011 include:

Buys: NXPI 2/1, ARMH 2/23, SINA 2/23, ARUN 2/23, TIBCO 4/15

Sells: FFIV 2/23, RVBD 4/1, QCOM 4/13

 

How Much Money Do You Need to Start Trading Full-Time

A Twitter follower just asked me how much dough did I have when I started trading full-time.  Instead of a quick response that will soon be lost in the Twitterverse, I decided to share a document that I wrote 5-6 years ago addressing this very question.  To be honest I haven’t reviewed it since, but it made sense at the time.

 

Capital Needed to Walk

 

It’s a consensus agreement among entrepreneurs that a business plan is essential for anyone starting a business.  How can you reach your destination – if you don’t know where you are going?  Most don’t question this wisdom, especially if start-up funding is sought.  It’s quite simple – whenever I am approached about investing in a business, I ask two deal-breaking questions:  How and when am I going to get my money back?  Those questions are impossible to answer satisfactorily without a plan.

I remember writing my first business plan and discovering the power of Microsoft Excel.  My business could be moderately or extremely successful by simply changing a couple variables in my revenue projections.  It was quite interesting how I always managed to make money no matter how much I tweaked the numbers.  Mystically, the sales always materialized.

One of the many lessons I learned during my first full-time entrepreneurial venture was that you can never have enough start-up capital.  I was so convinced that my day job was limiting my opportunities that I quit before securing the big contract.  All of my revenue projections included this contract as the baseline, without it – being moderately successful was a pipe dream.

In addition to not closing the large contract, collections were a challenge. As I waited for payments, the operation had to continue – payroll had to be met, supplies had to be purchased and don’t forget the rent man.  It is crucial to have enough cash on hand to manage through these types of circumstances. You can probably guess how this story ends.  Nine months later I was back punching the clock.  It didn’t have to end this way or at least not as quickly.

This story is quite common.  Ask ten entrepreneurs and most will have experienced similar scenarios.  I am willing to bet that even Bill Gates has a comparable story or two.  It is very rare that an entrepreneur doesn’t have cash flow problems at some point. My latest venture is much different.  I didn’t walk away from my J.O.B. until I had 4.5 times my annual expenses in the bank. Why four and a half times? Why not three or five?  Let’s take a look at how I derived the number.

First, I divided my capital into three buckets – day to day cash, intermediate cash and long term cash.  The day to day bucket is to address everyday living and business expenses.  The intermediate is to address unforeseen matters 1 to 5 years out.  Long term is for issues at least 5 years in future.

Next, I determined the return on investment (ROI) my business would generate.  This is quite subjective.  Really the only true measure is if it is based on history.  Thus, I highly recommend working the business part-time before venturing out.  The steady paycheck takes a tremendous amount of pressure off and allows time to determine whether the business is feasible.  The ROI is simply your profits divided by your investment.  So, if you invest $300,000 and return $100,000 – your ROI is 33%.  If your ROI is less than 20% – it may be wise to figure out what’s necessary to make your business more profitable before venturing out.

Once you are satisfied with your ROI, your Capital Needed to Walk (CNTW) is simple to calculate. The basic formula is the inverse of your ROI plus one and a half times your expenses.

CNTW (20% ROI) = 1/.2 + 1.5= 6.5 * Expenses

CNTW (25% ROI) = 1/.25 +1.5 = 5.5 * Expenses

CNTW (33% ROI) = 1/.33 + 1.5= 4.5 * Expenses

In my case, based on history, I believe that I can generate a 33% return on my investment each year.  So, before quitting my 9 to 5 – I accumulated 4.5 times my annual expenses.  The logic is that if one has 3 times their annual expenses invested in the business and can generate a return of 33% it will result in enough money to cover the next year’s expenses.  If this can be continued in perpetuity there will always be enough money to keep the doors open.  Obviously, some years will be better than others.  So, in the good years the additional money is moved into the intermediate bucket.  This serves as reserves that can be drawn upon in the in bad years.

Here are some CNTW break downs:

33% ROI:

  1. 1 Year Expenses Up Front
  2. 3 Years of Expenses Invested
  3. 0.5 Years Expenses in Intermediate to address shortfalls

25% ROI:

  1. 1 Year Expenses Up Front
  2. 4 Years of Expenses Invested
  3. 0.5 Years Expenses in Intermediate to address shortfalls

20% ROI:

  1. 1 Year Expenses Up Front
  2. 5 Years of Expenses Invested
  3. 0.5 Years Expenses in Intermediate to address shortfalls

 

Let’s take a look at a couple examples.

Annual Expenses – $100,000

ROI – 33%

Capital Needed to Walk = 1/.33 + 1.5 * ($100,000) = $450,000

 

Annual Expenses – $100,000

ROI – 25%

Capital Needed to Walk = (1/.33 + 1.5) * ($100,000) = $550,000

 

Annual Expenses – $100,000

ROI – 20%

Capital Needed to Walk = (1/.2 + 1.5) * ($100,000) = $650,000

 

Obviously there are many variations on this thesis.  Maybe one would be more comfortable with more reserves.  For instance, 2 years of expenses up front and 1 year for intermediate needs.

Annual Expenses – $100,000

ROI – 33%

Capital Needed to Walk = (1/.33 + 3) * ($100,000) = $600,000

 

Or maybe expenses can be reduced from $100,000 to $80,000.

 

Annual Expenses – $80,000

ROI – 33%

Capital Needed to Walk = 1/.33 + 1.5 * ($80,000) = $360,000

Cash is king and this rings especially true for businesses.  I have applied this approach to my stock trading business, but I believe that is applicable to any type of business.  The bottom-line is under capitalization is the demise of many businesses.

For the inquiring minds:

How did I accumulate my CNTW?

I did it the old fashion way – I earned it.  Whenever I received a bonus or a pay increase from my J.O.B. it went into the bank. It seemed kind of boring when my friends were buying all kinds of neat toys, but not so much now when they are stuck in traffic driving to work.  Also, I learned to use the bank of Wall Street.  Simply depositing money into the local bank is not good enough.