Sayonara Precious Metal Stocks Again

Investors are attracted to mining stocks due to their leverage to underlying metal.  When the leverage doesn’t materialize there is always a lot of questioning.  The current divergence between physical Gold & Silver and the Gold & Silver Miners is as large as I can recall since I began following the sector in 2002.  The chart below highlights the divergence between Silver (SLV) and the Junior Gold Mining ETF (GDXJ) over the past 6 months.

 

Today alone SLV was up +1.3%, while Helca Mining ( HL), Pan American Silver (PAAS) and Silver Wheaton (SLW) were down -7.5%, -1.6% and -2.3% respectively.  There are recent stories behind each.

These stories should remind us that there are tremendous business risks associated with mining stocks.  Not only are there accidents, potential strikes, rising input costs to deal with, but mines are like real estate – it is location, location, location.  Many mines aren’t located in business friendly countries.  Or maybe I should say sometimes they are friendlier than at other times.  When Silver was below $5/oz and almost uneconomic to mine, the Bolivan government welcomed Pan American Silver.  However, at $40/oz the Government has a better idea – like maybe it’s time for PAAS to hit the road.

The business risk have always been understood by precious metal investors and the leverage to bullion was their compensation for the risk.  In 2004, the dynamics of investing in precious metals changed with the release of the Gold ETF (GLD).  The Big Boys (Mutual Funds, Endowments, etc.) could now access precious metals without taking on the additional risk.  In March of 2007,  I penned an article called Sayonara Gold Stocks discussing the divergence in the behavior of the metals and miners.  My conclusion was that it didn’t make sense to continue investing in miners – bullion was a better option.  My favorite bullion play became the Central Fund of Canada (CEF), a combination gold and silver fund.  The silver provided a little juice versus GLD.  The Silver ETF didn’t exist at the time.

Interesting side story:  At the time, I was blogging a lot about investing in gold stocks.  One of the well known gold bugs sites was republishing all of my articles.  However, after Sayonara Gold Stocks - I was black-balled.  Kind of petty, but Whatever!

At some point, I got sucked back in and started trading the miners again.  With the huge divergence and the number of incidents over the past two weeks, miners are IMO  not worth the headache.  If you want leverage over the bullion trade the 2X ETFs or options.  That’s my plan and I’m sticking with it this time….

What is the Gold Oil Ratio Telling Us?

I discussed the Gold/Oil ratio and Silver Wheaton on StockTwits TV’s “Talk Your Book” Show on 5/20.  My blurb starts around the 5:30 mark.

Backgrounder:

Gold has to be one of the most complex investments to analyze.   It is an inflation hedge; a safe haven; a currency.  It is subject to investment as well as jewelery demand.  There are so many drivers that is almost impossible to figure out what really makes it tick.

I have invested/traded gold and gold stocks since discovering  it as an investment theme in 2002. The Gold Miners/Gold ratio is one of my favorite ways to decipher what’s happening in the gold market.  This past weekend I decided to dig into the Gold/Oil ratio. If my analysis is correct then next few months should be very exciting times for Precious Metals investors.  Let’s take a look at what I am seeing.

The Gold/Oil ratio should be fairly simple to analyze.  There are four combinations to consider: Gold & Oil prices both increasing; Gold & Oil prices both decreasing; Gold is increasing with Oil decreasing and Gold is decreasing with Oil increasing.  However, in reality there are more permutations. Gold and Oil could both be increasing, but Gold  could be increasing faster than Oil.  Gold prices could be flat with increasing Oil prices.  It quickly gets more complicated.

The matrix below captures various scenarios from the Gold/Oil ratio chart over the past 10 years.  The ID#’s correlate to the relationships observed in the chart.  For example, #1 identifies a period of time when Gold prices were flat while Oil prices increased.  The Gold/Oil ratio moved down and the Gold Mining Stocks (GDX) were range bound.

So, what does all of this stuff mean?  The ideal environment for Gold mining stocks is when gold prices are increasing and oil prices are decreasing.  Under this scenario gold mining stocks  run like a scalded chimp (sorry chimp lovers).   Think about it from the miners profit & loss perspective.  If the sales price of  their product is increasing (Gold) and one of their primary expenses is falling (Oil) – tremendous profits drop to the bottom line.

Certainly gold and oil move in opposite directions over short periods of time (days or weeks) quite often.  However,  over a multi-month period this scenario has only occurred a few times over the past 10 years  ( #6 on the chart).  This is simply an observation.  A more detailed analysis is left to those interested.

Each time this scenario has occurred, Gold Mining stocks got the scalded chimp treatment.  It is very difficult to see from the chart, but the GDX move initiated in 2001 was over 100% in 15-16 months.  The move at the end of 2008 was nearly 75% in 3 months.  Guess what? We are in the midst of this playing out again.

Over the past month gold has moved up while oil has moved down.  As expected, gold mining stocks are performing admirably.  From April 16 to May 14, GDX is up nearly 14%.  There is one other observation to note.  Under this scenario, the general stock market takes it on the chin.  True to form, the SPY is down 4.5% over the same time period.

The top panel plots the Gold/Oil ratio on a monthly time frame over the past 10 years.  The other panels plot the Gold Miners index (GDX), Gold, Oil and the S&P 500 over the same time frame.

Note:

I reviewed my analysis with a StockTwits buddy Xiphos_Trading. He agrees with my overall thesis and believes that I’m reading the tea leaves correctly.  He added that even if oil doesn’t decline as rapidly as it did in 2008 the weak economic backdrop should keep oil demand in check.  He also brought up the point that Oil is in contango which is bearish for Oil prices.  The “net-net” is lower oil prices, regardless of its rate of decline,  is bullish for gold miners.

Jim Rogers On Commodities

With China and India growing fast, famed investor – Jim Rogers, thinks the current commodities bull market has plenty of room to go…

HAI: What are the most pressing issues that commodity investors should understand?

Rogers: They should understand that until somebody brings on a lot of supply, commodities will do well. If people start seeing windmills on every roof and solar panels on every house, then maybe this [commodities boom] is coming to an end. If somebody discovers a gigantic gas field in Berlin, maybe this will start to change. Investors need to watch and see when and if new sources of supply develop.

But really, short of worldwide economic collapse, the best place to be is in commodities. There is no shortage of stocks. The world is cranking out new stocks every day. No one is cranking out new lead mines every day. People need to get a basic understanding of supply and demand, and then they’ll figure out what the big picture is, and they will make money.

More …

Potential Private-Equity Bid for BHP Billiton

In 2005, when I constructed the Big-Build Out (BBO) portfolio I imagined that there would be turn-over due to mergers and acquisitions.  However, never in my wildest dreams did I envision the world’s largest mining company, BHP Billiton, as a target.  Acquirer yes.  Target no way! That just demonstrates how much money is sloshing around looking for a home.

If you are not familiar with theory behind the BBO take look at its backgrounder.  The portfolio is up over 25% year to date.

Here is the current BBO roster: Continue reading “Potential Private-Equity Bid for BHP Billiton”

Is China Too Hot?

I am sure many were concerned on April 19th as it appeared that the markets were in for a repeat of the China led melt-down on February 27.  The Chinese Stock Market’s negative take on the countries 11.1% first quarter growth rate spilled over to Europe and cast a black cloud over the U.S. Markets as it opened.  The surge in growth rate coupled with a higher than acceptable consumer price index and a 23.7% growth in fixed-asset investment prompted statements such as the following from the government: 

“If this type of fast growth continues, there is the possibility of shifting from fast growth to overheating. There is that risk,” Li Xiaochao, spokesman for the National Bureau of Statistics, told a news conference.

The government will work to “reduce the country’s large trade surplus, limit rapid growth in house prices and maintain basic price stability” – was posted on the State council’s Web site following a meeting chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao

Continue reading “Is China Too Hot?”