Will Research in Motion Blow Investors Away at WES

On March 31st, Research in Motion (RIMM) released its quarterly earnings.  Prior to the report, every day for at least six weeks, I heard about RIMM’s storied pre-earnings run.  It reached a feverish pitch on March 8 – when the stock price penetrated a price gap from September.  In the technical analysis world, gaps that are penetrated are often filled.  The calls for $82 were all over the RIMM stream on StockTwits.

I use technicals as well as fundamentals  in my stock analysis.  My fundamental work is not the traditional examining of PEs, Book Values, etc., but trying to understand the catalyst that are driving the stock.

Apple’s iPhone has revolutionized the industry.  Every cell phone manufacturer is under tremendous pressure to design a competing phone.  Unfortunately, for stockholders the companies are not delivering and the stocks are taking a thumping. Nokia became the latest victim losing 13% of its value on Thursday.

During RIMM’s earnings conference call their CEO, Jim Balsillie, attempted to calm investor’s concerns about the future.  He said, “If you could see the roadmap, you’d be blown away.”  Blowing away time arrives on Monday 4/26 at the Blackberry WES 2010 Symposium.

In my opinion, unless their next phone featuring an updated OS and browser is shipping in June – it’s back to the woodshed for the stock.  Apple’s refreshed iPhone will be released in June.  Every day RIMM doesn’t have a competing phone it’s losing revenue and mind share.

I will be listening intently for a June release date of their next “super phone”.

For the record, I am short RIMM, PALM, NOK, MOT and long AAPL (For Investors the Smartphone War is Over). Positions could change at any time.

Revisiting My Palm Bet

On April 12, Bloomberg News reported that Palm had engaged Goldman Sachs and Frank Quattrone’s Qatalyst Partners to find a buyer.  Palm closed at $6.04/share that day.  The next morning, I wrote “I’m Betting on a Palm Take Under or Bankruptcy.”   Considering the stock has traded as high as $14 this year, a buyout of $6/share or less would qualify as a take under in my book.   Needless to say, it wasn’t a very popular position.

The news yesterday shows how desperate the situation is becoming.

Eric Savitz, Barron’s, released an article after the close that will have analysts scrambling over the weekend.  He concluded that Palm was worth about $5.09 a share to shareholders after backing out debt and taking into consideration a preferred position of Elevation Partners.  That assumes the company was acquired for $1.2B – a number the company’s advisers had been previously seeking (Reuters).

I am becoming more confident in my stance with each passing day.  Being right is one thing.  Making money while being right is another.  The later is the one I care most about.  I tweeted the following before the close “$PALM will best its low this week w/o a rescue this weekend. $4.50 sounds about right for Mon…”  Let’s see how it plays out.

Palm on Friday closed up 17 cents, or 3.5%, to $5.03.

I’m Betting on a Palm Take Under or Bankruptcy

Palm buyout talk has been the buzz since their dismal earnings report on March 19.  Yesterday, it reach a feverish pitch after Bloomberg News reported that the company has engaged Goldman Sachs and Frank Quattrone’s Qatalyst Partners to find a buyer.  Its stock price is up 50% over the last five days as investors get positioned for their big payday.  I’m taking the other side and betting on a take under or bankruptcy.  Here is why.

First of all, let’s take some potential pursuers names off the table.  Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola, Research in Motion, Google – won’t happen.  Of those five, Motorola would make the most sense.  However, Motorola has invested significant time and resources into Google’s Android.  That strategy is looking very questionable now with the release of Google’s own branded phone (Nexus One).  Motorola’s phone will always be a step behind Google’s phone as demonstrated at the Nexus One launch – when the Nexus One was running a newer version of the OS.

Nokia has little presence in the US, so Palm would help there.  However, Nokia already has two operating systems.  Would they want a third?  On 3/31,  at Research in Motion’s earnings  call their CEO said that analyst would be “blown away” with their new road map to be discussed at the end of April.  Getting involved with Palm buyout talks would call into question their road map and send the stock to the woodshed in a nanosecond.  Microsoft is fully committed to Windows Phone Mobile 7, so they are out.  Google is happy with Android.  So, who does that leave?

The names circulating yesterday were HTC, Lenovo, and Cisco.  Last night a report by Reuters, threw  two Chinese equipment makers into the mix – Huawei and ZTE (Huawei Approached by Palm).  From the report,

“Huawei and ZTE are potential buyers. It makes sense: they don’t have an operating system or a brand, but they have cheap manufacturing costs and money to invest and develop the brand,” said IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo in London.

“Consumers don’t associate Chinese brands with quality products and don’t pay a premium for such a mobile phone … Palm would be perfect for them.” ZTE, China’s No.2 telecoms equipment maker, could not be reached for comment.

As far as I am concerned the last statement, “”Consumers don’t associate Chinese brands with quality products” eliminated Huawei, ZTE and Lenovo.  Whether that statement is true or not can be debated.  However, in technology company buyouts, especially software, the most important asset walks out of the door everyday (the employees).  If Palm employees believe that they will be involved in a “non-premium” product they will walk.

HTC is a Taiwanese company that is making some in roads in the US.  Maybe a combination would put them in the “premiere” category.  They are being sued by Apple, so Palm’s patent portfolio may give it some ammunition to fight with.  There would definitely be some cultural issues that must be overcome.

That only leaves a few other candidates – Cisco, Dell and HP.  Dell and HP are war proven veterans from the PC battles.  They made their bones with a third party OS.  Do they really want to bring it in house?

Thus, the last company standing is Cisco.   On yesterday, I thought a Cisco buyout was a crazy idea and still kinda do.  However, it may be Palm’s only option.  Cisco provides the allure of working on premium products.  Both are West Coast companies, so cultures will be somewhat similar.  However, this ain’t John Chambers first rodeo.  Forget about a buyout premium. Palm’s average share price over the last 30 days is less than $5 and without the buyout speculation it would be even lower.

If Chambers bails Palm out it will be a take under.  If not Cisco – cancel Christmas.

Will Google Be a Major Player in Mobile Computing?

If you are interested in investing in the mobile internet then Morgan Stanley’s Internet Report is a must read.  The chart below is one of my favorite slides from the presentation.  As far as I am concerned, it’s the money slide. I believe that serious coin will be made by simply grasping its thesis.

The point is simple, but won’t be obvious until 2-3 years down the road.  Some of our favorite technology companies will not be major players in mobile computing.  I have taken some heat from Research in Motion fans by stating that it may not be a winner in the new cycle (RIM Rant).  I know it sounds crazy, but I am beginning to wonder if Google will falter.

Google is not Facebook or Twitter with some top secret monetization plan.  It is a public company with a $180B market cap.  It has a responsibility to its share holders to disclose its plans for making money.  Personally, I believe that Google is unsure of its mobile strategy.

Google receives no licensing fee for Android.  Companies are free to change Google from the default search engine in Android and are doing so.  Thus, their opportunity to leverage their ad network is diminished. Apple runs the most successful app store on the planet and their CFO says that it’s running a little over break-even.  If Apple can’t make money from its app store, Google most likely won’t either – especially since their reins are not nearly as tight.  Sales of Google’s branded phone, Nexus One, have been disappointing (Nexus One Sales lag Apple & Motorola).

Finally, last week Apple challenged the entire mobile advertising paradigm (Apple iPhone OS 4 Event – scroll to the 44 minute mark).   It is far too early to declare Apple’s advertising approach a winner, but Google’s pay per click is definitely getting a little long in the tooth.

Blogs of this nature can be quite controversial, because people love their gadgets- whether its an Android, Blackberry, Nokia, iPhone, Kindle or whatever.  The point of this blog is about making money.  Stare at that slide again and internalize the message.  Somebody ain’t gonna make it and you don’t want to be holding their stock.

The Buy and Hold Fairy

Fairy with a gift

I think that everyone who has ever bought a stock has dreamed of buying one for a few dollars per share and selling it down the road for many dollars per share.  The good old buy it, hold it and sell it at the top strategy.  In spite of a 40% pounding last year and a negative return over the last 10 years the dream is still alive. The tooth fairy bit the dust when most were 5 or 6 years old, but the Buy and Hold fairy must have nine lives or something.

The following is a headline from this weekend’s Wall Street Journal:  Top Fund Manager Sees Decade Ruined, Hodges ‘Very Much Embarrassed,’ Regroups after Nearly 50% drop in 2008.  The article goes on to say, “A $10,000 investment in Hodges Fund made 10 years ago would be worth around $9,015 today, compared with $7,720 if it was invested in the S&P 500 index.”  At least he outperformed the market. I didn’t read the rest of the article, because it wasn’t worth my time.  I betcha it didn’t mention the millions of dollars he collected in fees over the past ten years for that dismal performance.  Embarrassed give me a break.

In my opinion, to make a buck in the market you must first take charge of your own finances.  At least if you lose money, you won’t be shelling out thousands of dollars in fees to the “pros” for similar results.  Secondly, you must say good-bye to the Buy and Hold fairy.  She was comforting as a kid, but now it is time to move on.

Buy and Sell should be the new mantra.  Learn how to employ entry and exit techniques.  Become more of a trader than an investor.  If trading sounds too much like work, focus on saving and leave the market to others.